ICF _ APRIL 3 200

Malawian Students Are Not Failing — The System Is.

By  Fulbright Program scholar Gift Sukez Sukali, MFA

Studying in the United States  has been one of the most eye-opening experiences of my academic journey. Coming from Malawi, where I completed my undergraduate studies at Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences (formerly Malawi Polytechnic), I have had the rare opportunity to experience two very different university systems firsthand.

This experience has allowed me to reflect deeply on how education is structured, how students are supported, and why outcomes often differ between the two systems. While both Malawi and the United States value education, the difference lies in how institutions are designed to help students succeed.

A System Built Around Student Support

One of the biggest differences I noticed in the United States is the level of support available to students.

At Ohio University, support goes far beyond the classroom. Students have access to academic advisors, tutoring services, counseling, mental health resources, career development offices, writing centers, and countless extracurricular opportunities that contribute to both academic and personal growth.

The university environment is intentionally designed to support student success. If a student is struggling academically, emotionally, or personally, there are systems in place to identify that and offer help.

Professors are also highly accessible and genuinely invested in student progress. If you miss a class, it is not uncommon for a professor to reach out, check on your wellbeing, and even arrange a special session to help you catch up.

This was surprising to me because in Malawi, missing class is usually considered entirely your responsibility. Once you fall behind, catching up often depends solely on your own effort.

Why Many Students Excel in the U.S.

People often ask why many students earn distinctions and high grades in American universities.

The answer is simple: the grading system rewards consistent effort.

In many courses, simply attending class, participating actively, completing assignments on time, contributing to discussions, and engaging with course materials already puts a student in a strong position before final assessments.

By the time exams arrive, many students have already secured over 60% of their grade through continuous assessment.

For graduate students, it is even more interesting. Some courses do not have traditional invigilated exams at all. Instead, assessment is based on projects, presentations, research papers, and practical application of knowledge.

The system operates on trust and maturity. The assumption is that if you are pursuing graduate studies, you already understand your purpose and are committed to learning.

The Malawian Reality: Too Much Weight on Exams

During my undergraduate studies in Malawi, I experienced a very different system.

At the time, in my class at Malawi Polytechnic, only one student graduated with distinction.

This was not because the rest of us were incapable or less intelligent. Many brilliant students simply struggled within a system that places enormous emphasis on final examinations.

The challenge with an exam-centered system is that it often measures short-term memory and performance under pressure more than it measures actual understanding, consistency, creativity, or practical application.

A student may work hard throughout the semester, understand the material well, and still perform poorly because of one difficult exam.

I believe this is an area where Malawi’s education system can evolve. Assessment should focus more on whether students are consistently engaging with and applying knowledge, not just how they perform in a few hours of testing.

The Financial Burden Students Face

Another major difference is the student living experience.

In Malawi, many students face financial struggles that go beyond tuition. Students often worry about basic needs such as food, accommodation, transport, and survival itself.

This creates a heavy burden because students are fighting two battles at once: succeeding academically while also worrying about how to meet their daily needs.

In the United States, while students certainly face financial pressures, universities often provide systems that reduce these basic survival concerns through housing support, meal plans, campus employment opportunities, healthcare access, and emergency student services.

As a result, students are able to focus more fully on learning and development.

No student should have to choose between studying for an exam and figuring out what they will eat.

What Malawi Can Learn

Malawi has brilliant students with enormous potential.

What many students need is not greater intelligence or harder exams, they need stronger institutional support.

Our universities can benefit greatly by investing more in:

  • Continuous assessment systems
  • Student mental health support
  • Academic mentorship
  • Stronger lecturer-student engagement
  • Better access to extracurricular development
  • Student welfare systems that address basic needs

Education should not only test knowledge; it should create the right conditions for knowledge to flourish.

A Personal Reflection

Studying at Ohio University has shown me what is possible when an educational institution intentionally invests in student success.

It has made me appreciate the resilience of Malawian students even more. Many of us succeed despite limited support, difficult living conditions, and systems that demand everything while offering little margin for struggle.

If Malawian universities can combine the resilience of our students with stronger support structures, the results would be extraordinary.

The future of education is not about making learning harder.

It is about making success more possible.

Tags: No tags

33 Responses

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *